Election 2000
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 14:27:01 -0500 (EST)
Dear All,
These past few days, our nation has been absorbed in the question of
who should be our next President. We all know that the people have voted,
but now the question is, who won?
I hesitate to use this list for an issue that raises such partisan
passions, but because of my firm belief that the outcome of the election
does matter and will shape the world of the coming years, and may very
well also affect our own effectiveness as citizens working for a better
world, I choose to do so.
The big question now is, if Al Gore remains behind Bush in Florida
following the recounts and after all of the absentee ballots are in,
should Gore mount a legal challenge in Palm Beach County, in light of
the ballot problems there? Most of the discourse surrounding this
question has focused on democracy. To quote a friend, Matt Segal, "In
America, we don't hold elections so the people can get a president, we
hold them so that the people can CHOOSE a president." We make this choice
through our vote. Our vote (at least in the ideal) is a way for each of
us to connect to a process that is far larger than ourselves, to the
entire human enterprise. Through our vote, a statement of our view of
what the world ought to look like, we help that vision of the world come
nearer to reality. It is a profound act.
This may not express the thought processes of most voters, but even
when we are not conscious of it, that is the role of the vote. The vote
is a solemn instrument. We must, therefore, be very reluctant to endorse
actions that would effectively disenfranchise people, to endorse actions
that say, better to get this process over with than to do our best to make
sure that every vote is counted.
Our fidelity to democratic values is not all that is at stake,
however. The nature of U.S. involvement in the world is as well. And the
stakes are high. For all the talk of the prosperous times in which
we live, extreme poverty remains widespread, with 1.2 billion people
living on less than 1 dollar per day. The HIV/AIDS pandemic, which is
taking a tremendous toll on Africa, and is a rapidly growing problem in
other places, such as India, desperately needs our attention.
U.S. policy with respect to these and innumerable related issues,
policy that is to a large extent shaped by the president, will affect very
many millions of people throughout the world.
And so I fear a Bush presidency. During the second presidential
debate, Bush said the following, in response to a question that
referred to Africa: "Africa's important. And we've got to do a lot of
work in Africa to promote democracy and trade. . . . It's an important
continent. But there's got to be priorities. And [the] Middle East is a
priority for a lot of reasons as is Europe and the Far East, and our own
hemisphere. And those are my four top priorities should I be the
president." See NYT, Oct. 12, 2000. In other words, nearly all the world
but Africa would be his international priorities. And depending on the
reach of "Far East," perhaps also excluding some of the world's poorest
regions in Asia. "It's an important continent. But there's got to be
priorities." It sounds, then, that poverty reduction, development,
reducing public health threats, perhaps the greatest issues of
social justice of our time, would receive little attention under a
Bush presidency. People I talk to about the possibilities of future U.S.
funding for the global AIDS crisis are one in telling me, it depends on
the election.
The Clinton/Gore Administration has done far, far too little with
respect to the global AIDS crisis and the setting of poverty in which it
is embedded. But Gore has made some personal investments in the issue,
including speaking at the Security Council's meeting on AIDS in Africa in
January 2000. That month, during which American ambassador to the United
Nations, Richard Holbrooke, took on the rotating presidency of the
Security Council, the Security Council gave particular focus to Africa, at
Ambassador Holbrooke's initiative. See NYT, 12/21/99. Many expect that
Holbrooke would be Secretary of State in a Gore administration. See NYT,
10/26/00.
If, at the end of the process, it turns out that the American people
have selected George W. Bush as President, then he will have become
president through a democratic process, the best way we know how to govern
ourselves. We will work with that reality, try to get Bush to add Africa,
add poverty, add social justice to his priorities. And no doubt, if Gore
becomes the next president, he will certainly need to be reminded of his
responsibility to promote social justice around the globe.
When considering the costs of a possible war in the courts, with
battles in many states, I urge you to keep in mind that the effects of the
election will be felt not only at home, but also around the world. We
cannot be certain that Bush would pay as little attention to Africa as the
quote above suggests, nor can we be certain that a Gore administration
would pay more than the nominal attention to Africa that has often seemed
the case of the Clinton administration. But with so many lives in the
balance, I believe that as we think about and discuss the present state of
the election, with all the talk about the turmoil that prolonged
uncertainty might cause here in the United States, we should not forget
about the suffering throughout the world that may be reduced -- or
augmented -- as a result of the outcome of the election.
There are several links you might be interested in:
Some students here put together a persuasive demonstration that the
law in Florida requires judges to void elections in which there is doubt
about the true will of the voters, an analysis I'm sure that many of you
will find interesting. I will forward it to you as a separate e-mail.
Apologies to those of you who may have already seen this document.
Thank you.
Yours,
Eric
"I have only dreams: to build a better world, a world of harmony
and understanding, a world in which it is a joy to live. This is not
asking for too much." -- Yitzhak Rabin
"Don't say the day will come. Bring the day! Because it's not a
dream." -- Shir LaShalom, Song for Peace
Back to Better World.
|